I’ve been reflecting on the paper that I wrote in 2008, Guidelines for the development of a blog-based current awareness news service. Since then there has been new web 2.0 tools and applications; however the following two quotes from the 2008 article are still relevant today:
1. focus more on simplicity of design, which presents a clean and simple interface for users and draws attention to what is important, and
2. provide options for users to connect and interact with each other, and with the site. (p. 414)
· Be informed by practice and evidence
· Involve all stakeholders and be communally innovative
· Be nimble when responding to changes in consumer needs
· Evolve by constant revision and adaption
· Try something new or different
· Use imagination. (p. 427)
So when asked to come up with 10 criterion to evaluate a library website, I have found the task nearly impossible. Especially, when you include the set readings on library website design (Matthews 2009), kids website design (Lazaris 2009), online library identity (McBurnie 2007) and web 2.0 architecture (Governor, Hinchcliffe & Nickull, 2009), plus other useful resources, such as Steve Krug’s books on website usability. What I have opted to do is identify key categories used to evaluate a website, which depending on the purpose of the site and intended audience(s) would be tailored.
Navigation
- Use of terms and labels that are meaningful to your audience
- Provide different pathways for finding information
- Simple navigation with 'major' pathways/categories persistent on each page
- Provide an easy way to ask for help
Search
- Optimised search engine with a search box visible on each page
- For libraries – a catalogue search box on front page
- For libraries - federated search
Visual design
- Visual cues such as images and icons that contribute to the content and meaning
- Is written for the web (and intended audience)
- Uses relevant website design techniques such as: strong colours to emphasise key concepts, and use of whitespace to provide a clean and open feeling and improve readability.
- Is creative
Content
- Relevant, current content
- Added value content
- Engaging content
- User generated content
Accessibility
- Ensure good speed of multimedia download
- Is compliant with web accessibility guidelines and provides accessibility features, such as increase font size and alternative text for pictures.
Participation and engagement
- Provide an option to comment (may or may not be moderated) for relevant section
- Include a suite of social tools for relevant pages / sections such as re-tweet, bookmark, tagging, rating
- Make it easier for the user to subscribe by offering syndication via email and or RSS
On the go
- Mobile–friendly pages to ensure compatibility with a variety of screen sizes
Branding
- Is appropriately branded for online identity
For more food for thought view the infographic by Kissmetrics on The Evolution of Website design
1 comment:
Awesome site.Thanks for sharing.
social media marketing usa
Post a Comment